January, 2010

February 3, 2010

Hello all.

I am a few days late on this but I try not to post more than once a day and seeing as how Monday and Tuesday’s posts were already taken up, I had to wait until today. Anyway, here are the movies I watched in January…

January

1. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Peter Jackson, 2002)
2. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (Peter Jackson, 2003)
3. An Education (Lone Scherfig, 2009)
4. (500) Days of Summer (Marc Webb, 2009)
5. The Hurt Locker (Kathryn Bigelow, 2008)
6. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (Gavin Hood, 2009)
7. X-Men (Bryan Singer, 2000)
8. All the Real Girls (David Gordon Green, 2003)
9. Snatch (Guy Ritchie, 2000)
10. District 9 (Neil Blomkamp, 2009)
11. Adam (Max Mayer, 2009)
12. Big Fan (Robert D. Siegel, 2009)
13. Up in the Air (Jason Reitman, 2009)
14. Fight Club (David Fincher, 1999)
15. A Serious Man (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2009)
16. I Love You, Man (John Hamburg, 2009)
17. Fantastic Mr. Fox (Wes Anderson, 2009)
18. Out of the Past (Jacques Tourneur, 1947)
19. The Big Steal (Don Siegel, 1949)
20. Observe and Report (Jody Hill, 2009)
21. The Night of the Hunter (Charles Laughton, 1955)
22. The Night of the Hunter (Charles Laughton, 1955)
23. O Brother, Where Art Thou? (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2000)
24. Crazy Heart (Scott Cooper, 2009)
25. A Single Man (Tom Ford, 2009)
26. Humpday (Lynn Shelton, 2009)
27. World’s Greatest Dad (Bobcat Goldthwait, 2009)
28. The Seventh Seal (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)
29. Good Bye Lenin! (Wolfgang Becker, 2003)
30. Blades of Glory (Josh Gordon and Will Speck, 2007)
31. I Love You, Man (John Hamburg, 2009)
32. Dogville (Lars von Trier, 2003)
33. Crank: High Voltage (Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor, 2009)

Not much going on today, had to work this morning and plan on catching up on the movies I have from Netflix this evening and hopefully seeing the Hawks win a damn game. I hope everyone is having a solid week thus far.

Thank you for reading!

The 82nd Academy Awards

February 2, 2010

Hello all.

Actor in a Leading Role

Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart”
George Clooney in “Up in the Air”
Colin Firth in “A Single Man”
Morgan Freeman in “Invictus”
Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”

Actor in a Supporting Role

Matt Damon in “Invictus”
Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger”
Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station”
Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones”
Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”

Actress in a Leading Role

Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side”
Helen Mirren in “The Last Station”
Carey Mulligan in “An Education”
Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia”

Actress in a Supporting Role

Penélope Cruz in “Nine”
Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air”
Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart”
Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air”
Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”

Animated Feature Film

“Coraline” Henry Selick
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
“The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
“The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
“Up” Pete Docter

Art Direction

“Avatar” Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
“Nine” Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
“Sherlock Holmes” Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
“The Young Victoria” Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray

Cinematography

“Avatar” Mauro Fiore
“Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” Bruno Delbonnel
“The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
“Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
“The White Ribbon” Christian Berger

Costume Design
“Bright Star” Janet Patterson
“Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
“The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
“Nine” Colleen Atwood
“The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell

Directing

“Avatar” James Cameron
“The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
“Inglourious Basterds” Quentin Tarantino
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels
“Up in the Air” Jason Reitman

Documentary (Feature)

“Burma VJ” Anders Østergaard and Lise Lense-Møller
“The Cove” Nominees to be determined
“Food, Inc.” Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein
“The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers” Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith
“Which Way Home” Rebecca Cammisa

Documentary (Short Subject)

“China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province” Jon Alpert and Matthew O’Neill
“The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner” Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher
“The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant” Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
“Music by Prudence” Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett
“Rabbit à la Berlin” Bartek Konopka and Anna Wydra

Film Editing

“Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
“District 9” Julian Clarke
“The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
“Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe Klotz

Foreign Language Film

“Ajami” Israel
“El Secreto de Sus Ojos” Argentina
“The Milk of Sorrow” Peru
“Un Prophète” France
“The White Ribbon” Germany

Makeup

“Il Divo” Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
“Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
“The Young Victoria” Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore

Music (Original Score)

“Avatar” James Horner
“Fantastic Mr. Fox” Alexandre Desplat
“The Hurt Locker” Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
“Sherlock Holmes” Hans Zimmer
“Up” Michael Giacchino

Music (Original Song)

“Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
“Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36” Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas
“Take It All” from “Nine” Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
“The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett

Best Picture

“Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
“The Blind Side” Nominees to be determined
“District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
“An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
“The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined
“Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
“A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
“Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer
“Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers

Short Film (Animated)

“French Roast” Fabrice O. Joubert
“Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell
“The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)” Javier Recio Gracia
“Logorama” Nicolas Schmerkin
“A Matter of Loaf and Death” Nick Park

Short Film (Live Action)

“The Door” Juanita Wilson and James Flynn
“Instead of Abracadabra” Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström
“Kavi” Gregg Helvey
“Miracle Fish” Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey
“The New Tenants” Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson

Sound Editing

“Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson
“Inglourious Basterds” Wylie Stateman
“Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
“Up” Michael Silvers and Tom Myers

Sound Mixing

“Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
“The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
“Inglourious Basterds” Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
“Star Trek” Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
“Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson

Visual Effects

“Avatar” Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
“District 9” Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken
“Star Trek” Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton

Writing (Adapted Screenplay)

“District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell
“An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby
“In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher
“Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner

Writing (Original Screenplay)

“The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal
“Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino
“The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman
“A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
“Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy

Just a quick update after all the nomination madness this morning. Due to the fact that almost all of the categories were predictable, I only wanted to mention the Best Picture nominations. Here they are accompanied with their score on Rotten Tomatoes….

“Avatar” — 82%
“The Blind Side” — 70%
“District 9” — 90%
“An Education” — 95%
“The Hurt Locker” — 97%
“Inglourious Basterds” — 89%
“Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” — 91%
“A Serious Man” — 87%
“Up” — 98%
“Up in the Air” — 90%

Thoughts, everyone? Here’s to hoping The Hurt Locker comes out winning! Thank you for reading!

Hello all.

This month, and hopefully more in the future, I am taking part in a project entitled “Tackling the Oeuvre” in which a handful of people are individually watching one film of a director, in this particular case it is Lars von Trier, and writes about that film. The film given to me was Dogville.  As a sort of precursor to this, I would like to state that although I have always been extremely interested in von Trier, I have seen just a few of his films. The continually-growing interest in von Trier is correlated with the fact that my two greatest passions are philosophy and film, and von Trier is the contemporary king of making films that could easily belong to a category that would be labeled “philosophical cinema.” As always, I like to provide a fair warning for those who have not seen this film to avoid reading this until you do so, and I can assure you, in this case, the film is well-worth your time.

This film is about quite a few things, but at its core, Dogville is a story of both the negative and positive effects of power/control. The word “story” and “experiment” are realistically interchangeable while discussing this film. Tom, the town of Dogville’s philosopher, is in control of this experiment. To clarify, the experiment is to successfully assimilate an outsider, Grace. If the town is capable of doing so, Tom believes that this will be a statement in favor of the townspeople’s moral character. For those unfamiliar with virtue ethics, it is an ethical theory that focuses on the virtues of a person rather than his/her duties or the consequences of his/her actions. Essentially, Tom is a virtue ethicist in the sense that Grace’s acceptance would hypothetically come about through the townspeople’s good nature and warm disposition, and that Grace’s acceptance would not be the result of the townspeople feeling as if they are duty-bound to accept her or for their own well-being. The viewer slowly learns what happens when the people of Dogville are given power and control over Grace. The power that they feel is the result of Grace being indebted to them for potentially accepting her and as the film progresses, the viewer is made more and more aware of what actions these people are capable of justifying. According to my notes, I jotted down “PROBLEM OF POWER” four times, so clearly, it is an issue dealt with in the film.

There are no words for the final sequence. And if you’ve gone this far and have not seen the film, I urge you to stop reading and see the film. As great as the first two hours and fifteen minutes are, this film is pushed into the “masterpiece” conversation with its final half hour. I sat on the edge of my seat with my hand covering my mouth during the confrontation between Grace and her father, anxiously waiting for her decision. At this point, you feel as if you know what the right thing for her to do would be, which actually very well may be the case, but due to what the viewer has seen Grace go through (especially in the twenty minutes leading up to this point) I feel as if there is a definite possibility of not being able to take a step back and look at the situation objectively. The viewer wants justice for Grace, the character who up to that point had the least (as close to none as possible in her situation) amount of control is the ultimate decider of the town’s fate and the viewer cannot help but want her to do what is right. I credit von Trier’s writing/direction and Nicole Kidman’s exceptional performance for eliciting this feeling.

Lars von Trier is three for four when it comes to me. I loved Europa, Dancer in the Dark, and Dogville but absolutely hated Antichrist, which admittedly, has grown on me a little over time. I hope you guys enjoyed this, and I hope it is something that I get the opportunity to take part in again. Thank you for reading!

Hello all.

Today is championship Sunday, which is my favorite day of football of the year. Also, the Flyers are playing the Penguins on NBC here in a few minutes. Today will (hopefully) be a great day for sports. This post may be more personal than those that follow this site are familiar with due to the fact that I am making a decision on whether or not to keep my personal blog. “Keep” is probably not the right word; I should say update as frequently as I do. What I am leaning towards is keeping it so I am able to link to things that I do not want to clutter this site. It’s a difficult decision because I have had the other site for two years and to be honest I get a good deal of views per day over there as well.

As a huge fan of Denis’ Beau Travail and Jonathan Rosenbaum, I really enjoyed this article. Check it out if you’re a fan of the film and if you haven’t seen, then you should treat yourself to it. I have a bit of time off this week, at least in comparison to last week’s work-filled week, so I will be working through a bunch of films. I am starting to work my way through Bergman and I will keep you all updated on what I am watching and thoughts. I started with The Seventh Seal and was absolutely blown away.

Here are my last.fm stats for last week (people who follow my personal blog will be familiar with this as I post it on Sunday/Monday over there)…

This upcoming week’s playlist will have both of Los Campesinos! previous albums and will feature their newest on Tuesday when I pick it up. I have been a huge The Good Life kick lately, so I will probably include their Help Wanted Nights as well.

Thanks for reading this quick update and I hope everyone has a great Sunday.

Hello all.

O Brother, Where Art Thou? is another film that just barely made the cut, that is not to say that I do not love the film, because I really do. It is just that I have seen it so many times and there were a few others I wanted to include but at the same time I wanted to limit myself to fifteen films. In the end, my love for the film and the fact that the Coen brothers had a film released in 2000 led me to the fact that including this film was the right thing to do. I kept my notes on this film very specific because, as I have said, I have seen it so many times. This film is overfull with questions of morality and the weight of a conscience on the soul, which are factors that force me to love it that much more.

One thing I noticed this time around is what I would consider a “Coen touch,” which is characters’ justifications for personal pursuits as a sort of social commentary. That is to say that, as in real life, people will stretch reality to a point where what they are doing is perfectly justified (at least in his or her eyes). In the film, George Clooney’s character Everett steals John Turturro’s character Pete’s cousin’s watch. Clooney finds it to be fine due to the fact that Pete’s cousin later betrays them and justifies his action through the fact that he only stole the watch temporarily. As if, had the cousin not betrayed them, he would have easily returned it, which certainly is not the case. On a grander scale, the three main characters’ overall mission/journey/adventure is justified, once again by Everett, by a lie. This time, to show how out-of-the-ordinary and extreme the lie was, Everett is unable to come up with an explanation such as he does with the watch and any other situation he gets them into. It shows how strange the lie is insofar as before, the watch is a minor “misstep” but an action as bold as busting two other guys out of jail (one who was not far from release) is unjustifiable and unexplainable.

The characters in this film are obsessed with the notion of a “quick fix.” This may not be the most interesting of comments due to the fact that a good majority of the film’s characters are criminals and/or not the best people but I still think it’s a noteworthy point. Think back to Pete and Delmar rushing out (cutting in line while they are at it) to be saved in a congregation of people that they have no association with in order to get the quick fix of being saved and absolved of their sins. Tommy, the African American accompaniment, sells his soul to the devil in order to learn how to play the guitar “real good” instead of putting in the work in order to learn. Sure, there is a much deeper spiritual question in this notion but I still think it sufficiently adds to the reoccurring theme of “quick fixes.”

I have finally returned to the Year 2000 in Film project, with only seven, six after today, films left. I started this project over a month ago, and I still haven’t finished it. For that, I apologize. The last month marks one of the biggest shifts I have ever had and it has left me with only a limited amount of time. It did not help that December and January are the months in which I catch up on the big releases of 2009 so that I am ready for my End of the Year List and award shows. I hope you all enjoyed this, I am curious; Are there people who do not enjoy O Brother, Where Art Thou?

Thank you for reading!

Hello all.

I thought I would post some random sites and links that I have enjoyed the past week. I would also like to put out a friendly reminder to follow me on Twitter, be it my personal or this site’s account. I personally recommend checking out Closely Watched Trains (a running list of films the writer gets through on the They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They? list) and Film Fidelity (the writer there is currently going through 2009 releases). I read Commentary Track daily and always enjoy what’s written there.

This sort of post won’t be recurring, it’s just an attempt at getting something written seeing as how I have yet to go back to my Year 2000 in Film project. To be fair to myself, I am working on a certain piece, but it’s been a couple of months since I have seen the film so I am having a bit of difficulty with it. It should be up on Monday morning (no promises though!). I hope everyone has a good weekend.

Thank you for reading!

Best Films of 2009

January 14, 2010

Hello all.

I am a bit late for this as I was holding out to see a handful of films that I just never got around to/never came to Atlanta. I will set up this list by saying that I have yet to see the following films: A Prophet, Crazy Heart, A Single Man, Police, Adjective, Breathless, Bright Star, and Broken Embraces. Here goes…

  1. The Hurt Locker
  2. The White Ribbon
  3. Inglourious Basterds
  4. A Serious Man
  5. 35 Shots of Rum
  6. Up in the Air
  7. The Limits of Control
  8. An Education
  9. Up
  10. Moon

There are tons of honorable mentions, so I will just post a list of films I hated to leave off of this list: District 9, Observe and Report, Anvil! The Story of Anvil, Adam, Star Trek, and Zombieland.

If you all have any thoughts/problems with this list, let me know in the comments or email me. I would love to get some feedback. As I stated in my personal blog, this is the first year that I had a definite number one. I loved every film on this list (and a good deal more that came out last year) but nothing came close to the quality and experience that is The Hurt Locker.

Thank you for reading!

Snatch (Guy Ritchie, 2000)

January 5, 2010

Hello all.

I have quite the history with this film. Way back, before I was anywhere near as passionate as I am about film today, I adored this film. It belonged to the “arena of cool” films alongside Fight Club, Boondock Saints, and various other films that late middle school, early high school boys eat up. I was right there with them. I owned this on VHS and I used to watch it all the time. Only one of my brothers (I have three) enjoyed it as much as I do and I literally have no idea which one it is. One’s asleep and the other two are at school else I would try and find out the answer to that. I loved this film for what it was back then and to this day, I watch it every so often and still enjoy it just about as much as I did nine, close to ten, years ago.

I have always been curious as to whether or not I am in the minority or the majority in the fact that I enjoy this far more than I do Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels. A few years back this was not the case, but as the years have passed and I have revisited each several more times, I realize how much more reluctant I am to put in Lock, Stock… over Snatch. That is not to say that I do not enjoy Lock, Stock…,  just that I like/think Snatch is better. Comment and let me know which you prefer. One thing I can be certain of is that these films have decreased in value over the years for me. I don’t know if this is the result of an overexposure to more and more films each year or that the films just don’t hold up. I am leaning towards the former considering the fact that I enjoy these films a good bit when I actually sit down and watch them.

This movie is endlessly quotable. And the most quotable character is easily Brick Top. Again, this facet only contributes to the idea that it belongs in the previously mentioned arena of cool films. I should clarify that a film is not better or worse because it belongs to that category; it’s simply a distinction I like to make with certain films. Most passionate cinephiles will tell you that one of the most frustrating answers to the question “what did you like about the film?” is “it was such a cool movie,” or something to that effect. If you enjoy a film, then you should be able to clearly state as to why that is the case and vice versa.

I almost made a late switch with this film for Bryan Singer’s X-Men. I thought it might have been a good idea to include the film that successfully spawned the age of comic book movies that we are in now. Suppose it does not help that I enjoy the film quite a bit and recently watched it again. I stuck with this because I know for a fact that I would not put X-Men on my decade list but this has a chance, albeit a slight one, to be included. That’s it for now, I am officially halfway done with this project. It’s taking me long enough!

Thank you for reading!

Dancer in the Dark (Lars von Trier, 2000)

Hello all.

I have heard so much about this film over the years, and to be honest, I am extremely unversed when it comes to Lars von Trier so this was the main film I was looking forward to in this project. The only films of his I had seen leading up to Dancer in the Dark were Europa and Antichrist, one I loved and the other I hated. The viewer is thrown into the film, forced to pay close attention in order to get somewhat of a grip on what’s going on. The viewer being thrown in is important due to the fact that later in the film, the viewer learns that getting a firm grip on this film may be impossible.

Bjork’s, the lead actress, performance is outstanding, everything from her facial expressions to her singing all could not be any better. I would like to place an emphasis on the absolute importance of her facial expressions, they are enormously crucial in the emotional ride that this film takes you on. This is apparent in scenes such as Gene, her son, receiving the bike, and in the scene that would most likely be considered the climax. I refuse to go into much detail about the plot because I firmly believe that everyone should try and see this film at least once. Early on in my note-taking, I jotted down “the musical sequences are excellent and shot in an interesting way.” This of course ends up being a huge part of the film.

I am not particularly huge on discussing characters within films (seeing as how I prefer looking at films formally) but Selma is one the best characters I have seen on-screen this year. She is incredibly strong, though this may not be obvious (to be fair it definitely could be obvious, it just was not to me); it’s apparent when you realize she shows virtually no sign of weakness throughout the film, with one exception. The scene I am referring to takes place during Kathy’s first visit to Selma in jail, “I thought I was strong,” is the main indicator but she quickly, as if she absolutely must, regains her strength. This notion is solidified by the final scene: extreme weakness followed by extreme strength in a situation where NO OTHER human being would ordinarily feel any strength.

One has to love the blatant blending of drama and musical, especially as effectively as von Trier does in this film. The blend is even better if you consider that each musical sequence comes at a high point of drama. That is to say that at the height of a certain “high drama” sequence, a song typically follows. Each of the songs has been stuck in my head throughout the day. Von Trier is quick to separate these sequences to make sure the viewer understands that these musical numbers, outside of the finale, are dreams and not reality. By sufficiently separating the sequences, von Trier also manages to establish a clear, well-defined contrast between Selma’s terrible reality and wonderful dream sequences.

This is easily one of the best films that I watched for the first time in 2009. It’s only a coincidence that happened to also be the last film I watched. I love that I started the year 2009 off with Let the right one in and ended it with Dancer in the Dark. This film has barely left my mind all day and I would recommend it to anyone, especially those that love film.

Thank you for reading!